<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Appreciating American Libertarians – Insight from Ted Conover’s Book, Rolling Nowhere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourmorals.org/blog/2010/07/appreciating-american-libertarians-%e2%80%93-insight-from-ted-conover%e2%80%99s-book-rolling-nowhere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourmorals.org/blog/2010/07/appreciating-american-libertarians-%e2%80%93-insight-from-ted-conover%e2%80%99s-book-rolling-nowhere/</link>
	<description>Moral Psychology Findings and Discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:03:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ravi</title>
		<link>http://www.yourmorals.org/blog/2010/07/appreciating-american-libertarians-%e2%80%93-insight-from-ted-conover%e2%80%99s-book-rolling-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polipsych.com/?p=243#comment-319</guid>
		<description>@Jon Thanks

@Zeljka - Some effects are actually reasonable as a function of the standard deviation (e.g. Libertarians are half a standard deviation higher than conservatives on openness to experience and reactance).  The fact that we showed the full scale in the bar graph may make the effects seem smaller.  Still your point is important as in the context of the scale labels, the effects may indeed be considered small.  You&#039;re absolutely right about the difference in attitudes toward how to construct society, though liberals might frame it differently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jon Thanks</p>
<p>@Zeljka &#8211; Some effects are actually reasonable as a function of the standard deviation (e.g. Libertarians are half a standard deviation higher than conservatives on openness to experience and reactance).  The fact that we showed the full scale in the bar graph may make the effects seem smaller.  Still your point is important as in the context of the scale labels, the effects may indeed be considered small.  You&#8217;re absolutely right about the difference in attitudes toward how to construct society, though liberals might frame it differently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeljka buturovic</title>
		<link>http://www.yourmorals.org/blog/2010/07/appreciating-american-libertarians-%e2%80%93-insight-from-ted-conover%e2%80%99s-book-rolling-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>zeljka buturovic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 21:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polipsych.com/?p=243#comment-276</guid>
		<description>these effects look pretty small to me. but that wouldn&#039;t be very surprising because you appear to be following a tradition of explaining ideology without referencing people&#039;s beliefs.

nevertheless, i believe that your main conclusion &quot;that there is something that liberals can identify with in the american libertarian&quot; is correct. liberal-tarians have argued for a fusion between liberals and libertarians for some time now. 

based on the data that i have seen, some libertarians are indeed attracted to liberals but, in my opinion, that is a minority and is likely to remain such. 

one of the main differences between liberals and libertarians is their attitude towards elitism - an assumption (wide spread among liberals and progressives) that some people have much more knowledge than others and can therefore be trusted to preempt those other people&#039;s decisions by, for example, (re)designing social institutions from the top down. but most libertarians believe in spontaneous order, which assumes that human ignorance is rampant and that, in most cases, decisions based on the &quot;the knowledge of the particular circumstances of time and place&quot; are superior to those based on technocratic visions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>these effects look pretty small to me. but that wouldn&#8217;t be very surprising because you appear to be following a tradition of explaining ideology without referencing people&#8217;s beliefs.</p>
<p>nevertheless, i believe that your main conclusion &#8220;that there is something that liberals can identify with in the american libertarian&#8221; is correct. liberal-tarians have argued for a fusion between liberals and libertarians for some time now. </p>
<p>based on the data that i have seen, some libertarians are indeed attracted to liberals but, in my opinion, that is a minority and is likely to remain such. </p>
<p>one of the main differences between liberals and libertarians is their attitude towards elitism &#8211; an assumption (wide spread among liberals and progressives) that some people have much more knowledge than others and can therefore be trusted to preempt those other people&#8217;s decisions by, for example, (re)designing social institutions from the top down. but most libertarians believe in spontaneous order, which assumes that human ignorance is rampant and that, in most cases, decisions based on the &#8220;the knowledge of the particular circumstances of time and place&#8221; are superior to those based on technocratic visions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Haidt</title>
		<link>http://www.yourmorals.org/blog/2010/07/appreciating-american-libertarians-%e2%80%93-insight-from-ted-conover%e2%80%99s-book-rolling-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Haidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 21:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polipsych.com/?p=243#comment-274</guid>
		<description>Ravi, this is fantastic. I think you are developing your own academic mashup style: taking journalism or literature and showing what psychological processes are in play, to augment one of the goals of the journalist or novelist, which is to help people get inside other people&#039;s heads. Bravo! More, please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ravi, this is fantastic. I think you are developing your own academic mashup style: taking journalism or literature and showing what psychological processes are in play, to augment one of the goals of the journalist or novelist, which is to help people get inside other people&#8217;s heads. Bravo! More, please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

