The Gaza Conflict and Being Pro-Peace rather than Anti-War

November 18th, 2012 by Ravi Iyer

One of my favorite Mother Theresa quotes is: “I was once asked why I don’t participate in anti-war demonstrations. I said that I will never do that, but as soon as you have a pro-peace rally, I’ll be there.

The current conflict in Gaza between Hamas and Israel requires the thoughtful liberal to navigate a few seemingly conflicting thoughts. On the one hand, liberals generally believe that peaceful means are more effective than military means at achieving long term success. This often manifests itself in opposition to military action, such as the Iraq war, Vietnam war, etc.. On the other hand, there is no country or government that would tolerate missiles being launched at their large civilian populations and the Israeli response to missiles being launched from Gaza is a response that every nation would take if in the shoes of the Israelis. Defending civilians against attack is just.

The point of this blog post is to point out that you don’t have to choose between being pro-peace and remaining anti-war, as these attitudes, while related, are not perfectly correlated. In a paper that is forthcoming in the journal Political Psychology, we found that you can find meaningful differences in what being pro-peace and being anti-war predict.  Being pro-peace relates to caring about others, while being anti-war is related to attitudes toward authority, for example.  The multi-dimensional nature of peace-war attitudes is reflected in the real world in the above quote by Mother Theresa, and by the assertions of soldiers and politicians everywhere that their ultimate goal is peace.  In the current conflict, it is perfectly reasonable to believe that the Israelis have every right to defend themselves against attack (therefore not being anti-war), while also faulting both Hamas and the current conservative Israeli leadership for not pursuing peace more vigorously (therefore being pro-peace).

Indeed, I’m writing this in part as a response to a beautifully written essay by Jessica Apple, a writer who lives in Tel-Aviv, which ends:

And as Israel pummels the Gaza Strip, there is no Israeli political leader saying, as Rabin did, “Enough of blood and tears.” [the leader of the opposition party] has, in fact, supported the government’s actions as just, without questioning whether they are wise…..I do agree that Israel has the right to protect its citizens. But I condemn Israel’s current leaders for failing to recognize that the best defense is peace.

The full essay is well worth reading. I pray for the welfare of all the innocent people caught between forces beyond their control in the region and hope to see peace prevail before it is too late for both sides’ welfare.

- Ravi Iyer

Posted in anti war demonstrations, gaza, hamas, mother theresa, news commentary, peace, political psychology, soldiers, war, yourmorals.org5 Comments »

5 Responses to “The Gaza Conflict and Being Pro-Peace rather than Anti-War”

  1. Rochelle Herman says:

    You write it is reasonable to fault Israel (as well as Hamas) for not pursuing peace. Would you kindly be specific as to what Israel could do to pursue peace? Please be specific, i.e., give land, agree to a specific concession, etc.)

  2. Ravi Iyer says:

    A hard freeze on settlement construction would be a big confidence booster. And working toward some type of final status sharing of Jerusalem would solve the most intractable issue.

  3. Don Denny says:

    Mr. Iyer, Hamas (Islam) has no intention of peace. That fact is in their Koran.

  4. Ravi Iyer says:

    I disagree and further think that broad dispersions of entire religious texts (e.g. Atheists make the same kind of statements about the Bible) are almost always designed to sow conflict. But I acknowledge that, for better or worse, there are people out there who share your views.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply