||Create an Account||Explore Your Morals||About Us||Links|
|Welcome Anonymous User - login or register|
The scale you completed was the "Moral Foundations Sacredness Scale," developed by Jesse Graham and Jonathan Haidt at the University of Virginia.
The reason you may have rated cartoons beforehand is we are investigating the influence of humor on moral values. Some researchers have argued that humor has the ability to weaken our moral convictions. In this study we were interested in finding out whether this is the case.
The figures below show your average response for each foundation (in green) compared to those of the average Liberal (in blue) and the average Conservative (in red) website visitor. Because we can't treat "never, for any amount of money" as a dollar figure, we just scored your responses on an 8 point scale, where $0 is scored as "1" and "never for any amount of money" is scored as "8". Higher bars indicate that you care about that foundation more strongly.
To truly treat something as sacred means that you would not violate that value for any amount of money. The number of times you chose that response, for each foundation, is shown below (compared to the number of times that liberals and conservatives chose the "never" response.) Numbers here run from 0 (you never chose "never") to 5 (you chose "never" all 5 times, indicating that the foundation is as sacred as could be to you).
For the items in which you responded that you would do something for a certain monetary amount, your "price" is displayed below. (Of course, if you chose "never" one or more times for a foundation, then the price below is meaningless)
* It would take an average of $0 to get you to violate the HARM foundation.
To learn more about Moral Foundations Theory, you can read this paper, the first one written on the topic: Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive Ethics: How Innately Prepared Intuitions Generate Culturally Variable Virtues. Daedalus, pp. 55-66
Return to the "Explore" page.